Friday, 12 September 2008

Tessie's Preliminary Research Findings

Dear Colleagues,

I finally got some preliminary findings from the survey. The questionnaire about using technology (computers and the Internet) in EFL tertiary teaching was administered to 42 lecturers from 7 Thai public universities. It was found that among 15 statements of beliefs about technology-enhanced language instruction, the majority of the respondents reported that they hold beliefs represented in statements number 5, 3, and 13 respectively. More than 70 percent of the respondents agreed on the statement of beliefs number 5, that student do online language exercises according to their proficiency levels. In the same way, statement of beliefs number 3 mentioning students using online references such as dictionaries or translation tools to improve their written texts was also selected. There was as well a high response rate on Item 13 which represents the role of technology as a tool for student to access authentic language input such as television, radio, and news websites in order to stimulate students’ language output.

On the other hand, only 16.6 percent of the respondents had chosen statement number 14 which focuses on students creating web pages to connect themselves to a broader community. In addition, only 20 percent of the respondents had agreed on number 11 (using the tool to promote knowledge construction) and number 7 (students go online to get corrective feedback) as their most relevant beliefs about technology in their teaching.
















From the above results, I would like to open a discussion here.
- Why do Thai university teachers perceive technology integration in that way?
- What would be underlying reasons of their stated beliefs?

All comments, suggestions and ideas from language teachers and students are very much welcome!

NOTE: Please scroll down and you will see a 'post a comment' where you can type your comment.

Thank you. Your interest is very much appreciated. :-)

Tessie


P.S. These are 15 statement of beliefs in my questionnaire:
1. Students word process their written assignments or essays to reduce spelling and mechanical mistakes.
2. Emails, chat, and web discussion are used to provide students with greater opportunities to practice English language.
3. Students use online references such as dictionaries or translation tools to improve their written texts.
4. Students are encouraged to join social network sites or online groups such as Facebook, hi5, Yahoo, or Google group to exchange ideas with other people in English.
5. Students do language exercises (e.g. pronunciation practices, choosing the correct verb forms, and error detections) in the CD-ROMs or recommended websites according to their proficiency levels.
6. Computers are used to deliver multimedia lessons (e.g. shopping, using health services, and using public transportation) in order to promote learners’ motivation.
7. Students go online to get corrective feedback on their language from more competent English language speakers.
8. Students practice online authentic communication such as sending emails and web conferencing as an apprenticeship for their professional skills.
9. Students work on online tasks using websites to develop critical thinking (e.g. evaluating sources, identifying facts from opinions, and finding possible solutions).
10. Students study native speakers’ language in academic English websites as a model of academic genres such as essays, reports, and
11. Emails and chat rooms are used to promote knowledge construction through inquiring, exchanging ideas, and discussion.
12. Students use chat and emails to establish intercultural competence (i.e. understanding one’s culture and others’ cultures) with international keypals.
13. Online authentic English sources such as television or newspaper websites (e.g. BBC, VOA, and Bangkok Post) are used to stimulate students’ verbal or written communication.
14. Students publish their academic or personal web pages to connect themselves to a broader community.
15. Students individually or collaboratively create an English web site to promote their communities or to serve local organizations (e.g. tourist information sites , schools, and OTOP shops).

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dearest Aj. Aom

First of all, it's better to know all 17 statements of beliefs (as a EFL teacher, I can select mine)and some background of the 42 informants (it would help in case if we want to refer to their background of knowledge, computer skill or frequency of their Internet access) before discussing here. However, according to the original post, I think the respondents might concern more about students' autonomous learning and self-practice that they can learn the language when they want to learn and when they are ready to practice it. Doing so on their own, they can make sure that the exercise they are doing is appropriate to their English proficiency level (individual differences in learners are taken account here). If they choose to do an easy one, they can get high scores. This will motivate them to try the more dificult one and see how well they can demonstrate their English (I think i+1 theory of Krashen can explain this). Moreover, the respondents might realize that the students should have an opportunity to get familiar with the native accent (as we know, Thai students rarely have a chance to communicate in English and with the native speaker, so they might think it's easier to access to the online authentic language input to enhance their English knowledge). The principle on extensive L2 input is also concerned in this case.

On the other hand,students' computer and Internet skills might be taken into account that some respondents agree that most Thai students cannot create their own web pages and their communicative English is not good enough to make connection to a broader community. Also, they might realize that online corrective feedback is not as enough as the learners want and maybe not a clear explanation for them.

As a learner and EFL teacher, I don't think that online corrective feedback can provide with all what we want. Maybe, we still question what we've got from the feedback itself. It helps but to a certain degree. That's why the role of teachers is still important, and teachnology and CALL cannot completely replace it (I think I'm not to the point now... So Ajarn Aom kha I hope this all above would help na kha). Your topic is very interesting and I'd like to see you update the results on this blog na kha.

With best regards,

Kanuengnit Jittrong

Ajarn_Aom said...

Dear Nij,

Thank you so much for being the first contributor to this discussion. You've mention teachers' concerns on students' language proficiency which become the barrier for establishing interaction with international keypals. This is one of the most dominant reasons why Thai university teachers perceive technology as a tool for individual practice.

I would like to hear more from our fellow teachers. Is it true, in the Thai EFL context, that we will never reach the interactive features of information technology?

Cheers!

Unknown said...

Excellent article - thanks! It seems that you have answered the best related to the Topic with all best example as well... Thanks again for spreading the good work in the Society ...


Construction Tools

Anonymous said...

А! Sehr guter Beitrag.

Anonymous said...

需要不断的测试我的博客。没有工作,因为我希望它没有。 THx中的主题。也许这将让我看更好。